iten
Ateneo
iten
Ateneo

Design for X

Description

Design for Assembly

Design for Assembly according to Boothroyd and Dewhurst approach to reduce the number of components and assembly time.
Conceptual Design for Assembly according to the Stone & McAdams approach used in the conceptual design phases to reduce assembly costs and production processes.

Design for Disassembly
Design for Disassembly according to the Priority Matrix and Disassembly Sequences approach, to identify critical operations and critical disassembly paths

Design for End of Life
Design for End of Life according to the Materials Selection approach to comply with regulations (REACH, RoHS, etc.) and to increase product recyclability.

Laboratories

The activities are carried out in the Virtual Prototyping laboratory

Publications

  1. Mandolini, M., Favi, C., Germani, M., & Marconi, M. (2018). Time-based disassembly method: how to assess the best disassembly sequence and time of target components in complex products. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(1–4), 409–430. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1201-5
  2. Favi, C., Marconi, M., Germani, M., & Mandolini, M. (2019). A design for disassembly tool oriented to mechatronic product de-manufacturing and recycling. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 39(November 2018), 62–79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.11.008
  3. Favi, C., Germani, M., Luzi, A., Mandolini, M., & Marconi, M. (2017). A design for EoL approach and metrics to favour closed-loop scenarios for products. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 10(3), 136–146. http://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2016.1270369
  4. Favi, C., Germani, M., Luzi, A., Mandolini, M., & Marconi, M. (2017). A design for EoL approach and metrics to favour closed-loop scenarios for products. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 10(3), 136–146. http://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2016.1270369
  5. Peruzzini, M., Mandolini, M., & Raffaeli, R. (2016). A Design-to-sustainability Platform based on Functional Representations and Simplified Geometric Layouts. In CAD’16 (Vol. 14, pp. 301–312). Vancouver: CAD Solutions LLC. http://doi.org/10.14733/cadconfP.2016.60-64
  6. Marconi, M., Favi, C., Germani, M., Mandolini, M., & Mengarelli, M. (2017). A Collaborative End of Life platform to Favour the Reuse of Electronic Components. Procedia CIRP, 61, 166–171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.169
  7. Favi, C., Germani, M., Mandolini, M., & Marconi, M. (2017). A Software Tool for the Analysis and Management of Resource Consumptions and Environmental Impacts of Manufacturing Plants. Procedia CIRP, 61, 341–346. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.166
  8. Favi, C., Germani, M., Mandolini, M., & Marconi, M. (2016). Includes Knowledge of Dismantling Centers in the Early Design Phase: A Knowledge-based Design for Disassembly Approach. In Procedia CIRP (Vol. 48, pp. 401–406). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.242
  9. Favi, C., Germani, M., & Mandolini, M. (2016). Design for Manufacturing and Assembly vs. Design to Cost: Toward a Multi-objective Approach for Decision-making Strategies During Conceptual Design of Complex Products. Procedia CIRP, 50, 275–280. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.190
  10. Favi, C., Germani, M., Mandolini, M., & Marconi, M. (2016). Disassembly Knowledge Classification and Potential Application: A Preliminary Analysis on a Washing Machine. In Volume 4: 21st Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 10th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems (Vol. 4, p. V004T05A011). ASME. http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59514
Scientific Manager
Working group